WHATEVERWEARE
Free situationship calculator for the group chat.
About
WHATEVERWEARE is a browser-based situationship calculator built for the group chat. Users answer a short no-sign-up set of questions about reply speed, labels, story views, red flags, green flags, consistency and emotional clarity, then get a 0-100 verdict with receipts, an expiration window and shareable output. It is designed to be fast, funny and easy to send to friends, while still giving users a structured way to reflect on confusing dating dynamics. The product works as a lightweight social tool, a conversation starter, and a shareable entertainment experience that turns messy relationship ambiguity into a clear score and verdict.
Ready to launch?
Submit your product and get discovered by builders and creators worldwide.
Launch Now
FounderPlaybooks.
What other founders did to grow.
2722 dispatches from hundreds of founders, pulled from the week's best podcasts.
a lot of founders only think about market size also ask how many smart capable founders are actually choosing to build here in sexy categories AI apps social platforms creator tools the market might be huge but you're competing against hundreds of wellfunded teams in unsexy markets you get the opposite real demand high willingness to pay and very few people who want to touch the category that a symmetry is your edge
Score ideas on competition-to-demand ratio, not market size
Stop scoring ideas on TAM alone. Score them on the ratio of demand to capable founders chasing it. In AI / creator tools you're outgunned by hundreds of well-funded teams; in unsexy compliance, tax, legal, and immigration workflows you face almost zero serious competitors despite obvious demand and high willingness to pay. That competitor-vacuum is your moat before you've written a line of code.
when it's something that they feel on almost a values basis should be free the emotion that is elicited is disgust and anger and when you're trying to build a multi-billion dollar brand that is not an emotion even if it's actually short-term subscription maximizing not an emotion you want to elicit
Disgust and anger tell you the paywall line is wrong
Skylight uses emotional reaction as the primary paywall calibration signal, not conversion data. If customer interviews or reviews reveal disgust rather than reluctant acceptance, the feature comes out of the paywall regardless of short-term subscription lifts. For a brand trying to grow over a decade, anger is a long-term churn and word-of-mouth cost that never shows up in the experiment dashboard.
There's a play for whatever you're stuck on.
Read all 2722 playbooks