
cl0q
Free Search Engine, Going Open Source Soon
Developer Tools·AI & Machine Learning·Productivity
What is cl0q?
cl0q is a free, independent search engine. Instead of reselling another search engine's results, it runs its own crawler and its own full-text index, adding thousands of new websites every day with a stated goal of reaching 100 million sites in the index. Searches are used without an account, and the site says it does not store search logs: queries are processed in memory and then discarded, with no cookies, search history, or behavioral ad targeting.
The engine works in three stages. Its own crawlers fetch and parse pages from the open web at most one request per second to any server, cl0q builds a ranked full-text index enriched with DNS and network data, and search returns ranked results in milliseconds. The search page also offers power operators for exact phrases, site and TLD filtering, title and URL matching, and infrastructure lookups such as IP, CNAME, ASN, and hosting organization, which can be combined.
The project is aimed at people who want a search engine that is independent of other providers and that keeps no record of what they search. It also suits people who want to explore the web's infrastructure through network-level pivots. Accounts are optional and passkey-only, and only used for community features.
What sets cl0q apart is its stated plan to go open source. Once the code is published, users will be able to read it and run their own copy. A contributor program in early access lets others run crawler nodes that add pages to the shared index; the crawler node code is published on Codeberg, and nodes are currently set up by hand.
Ready to launch?
Submit your product and get discovered by builders and creators worldwide.
Launch NowFounderPlaybooks.
What other founders did to grow.
2722 dispatches from hundreds of founders, pulled from the week's best podcasts.
do you believe what you say is valuable I'm like of course like that's why I I do it I think you know people find Value in it he's like then why don't you believe that in like your core that it has value like monetarily you put emotional value on it but not monetary value
Believe your work has monetary value
If you can defend your work as emotionally valuable but freeze when naming a price, that's a pricing-confidence gap, not a market problem. Do the internal work: write down who'd pay, what problem only you solve, and the number that reflects that. Pricing confidence is a prerequisite for monetization, not an output of it.
Reviews are super important for an app on the app store to get ranked at the top. So I also made sure that my users would give me good reviews and that's why I show these in-app reviews at an appropriate timing. So for me I'm just showing it after the user has accomplished something. For example has added a wish or fulfilled a wish. So when the user feels good.
Trigger In-App Review Prompts Only At Moments Of User Accomplishment
Chris ties the in-app review prompt to moments of user accomplishment, like adding or fulfilling a wish, when the user is feeling good. He credits this timing for the steady flow of positive reviews that pushed Wishlist up the App Store rankings without paid marketing.
There's a play for whatever you're stuck on.
Read all 2722 playbooks