Founder Playbook · Sub Club by RevenueCat
9 tactics from Ramit Arora
Operating Like a Start-up inside the World's Biggest Company — Ramit Arora, Microsoft
Watch the full episode“On app store it's very Democratic App Store I like to think about it like YouTube is right like Paramount Pictures and a YouTube influencer they're pretty much competing for the same eyeball so we don't get a lot of advantage… a startup can start in Bangalore and start taking the spot on some keyword and start showing up above word.”
App Store Is Democratic — a Startup in Bangalore Can Outrank Microsoft on a Keyword
Ramit's bluntest insight: the App Store strips away brand moats. Microsoft has no guaranteed placement over a two-person shop. Every app — regardless of company size — has to earn discoverability through ASO, reviews, and relevance. For indie developers, this is the level playing field that makes the app store worth competing on.
“We see almost a 5x higher trial to paid conversion rate on mobile than on other channels sometimes because of very obvious reasons like this credit card is already attached and there is a frictionless experience people trust providers like Apple Google Amazon to essentially manage their subscription.”
Mobile Gets 5x Higher Trial-to-Paid Than Web — Because the Credit Card Is Already There
Even at Microsoft's scale, the mobile app store drives dramatically higher conversion than web or direct channels. The friction of entering payment details on web kills trials; on mobile the card is stored and trust is already established. This frictionless payment flow is itself a growth lever — not just a convenience.
“You have to think about neutralization… you have to keep differentiating then you have to keep incubating and you have to keep maintaining… for example Apple releases dark mode Apple release Vision Pro so we always maintain a leadership position in the sense that our apps are already on Vision Pro day one.”
Neutralize, Differentiate, Maintain, Incubate — the Four-Part Framework for Staying Ahead
Ramit's VP ran a four-part competitive framework: neutralize any competitor move before it erodes position, differentiate continuously, maintain core quality, and incubate the next wave. The allocation shifts as the app matures — early-stage apps spend more on neutralization; mature apps can invest more in incubation. Startups and giants both need this loop.
“We have a jobs to be done approach like we know okay we think that these are the 10 things that we really want our apps to rank for… what kind of customers do you want to acquire the ones that will actually find value enough that they will want to pay for the premium subscription.”
JTBD Before ASO: Know Which Jobs You Want to Rank For Before Choosing Keywords
Microsoft's keyword strategy starts from jobs-to-be-done — what tasks users actually need to complete — not just search volume. The second filter is monetization intent: rank for keywords that attract users willing to pay, not just search. Pairing JTBD with keyword research closes the gap between traffic and revenue.
“In one month you will have one scan and use case in one month you will have one say two document use case but when you combine everything together in one app then your retention is maintained… on a suite level we see good retention because on a sweet level there is that retention which is maintained because of different different use cases.”
Suite Bundling Retains Users Because Scenarios Rotate — Scanning Month, Document Month
Microsoft bundles Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Notes, Scanner and PDF signing into one M365 app. A user who barely touches it some months will have a scanning need next month and a document need the month after. The suite's breadth creates retention that no single-feature app can match — each scenario keeps a different segment engaged across time.
“Optimization comes much after your product market fit is there… we had product market fit in a big way on desktop but it took some years to kind of get that same stickiness on mobile where we saw okay our mobile apps our iPad apps are now like at a point where we can now start doing optimization so I think now the pendulum is turning.”
Optimization Only Starts After Product-Market Fit — Not Before
Microsoft had MMP tools early but couldn't get value from them because the mobile apps hadn't found product-market fit yet. Ramit's lesson: don't pay for growth infrastructure before the product is sticky. Once mobile PMF clicked, the same tools became high-ROI. Sequencing matters — optimize only what's already working.
“Our VP is very very strict about this like estimated impact any kind of vendor we have to bring in or anything that we have to do any kind of optimization he's like okay give me the estimated impact… the biggest ideas are the simplest ones… sometimes the simplest things like performance reliability file open speed size of the app those things matter a lot.”
Prioritize by Estimated Impact — Microsoft's VP Rejects Ideas Without a Number
With hundreds of millions of MAU, the Microsoft team rejects any idea that can't show estimated user impact. Every backlog item needs a number before it earns priority. Ramit's counterintuitive finding: the highest-impact ideas at scale are often the unglamorous ones — performance, reliability, transaction completion — not new features.
“I think there's a lot of hubris right like if I don't do anything with AI my investor will not fund me my career will go nowhere so I think that's a very scared approach the problem map and solution have to align.”
AI Must Solve a Real Job — Not Just Exist in the App Because Investors Expect It
Ramit saw many apps integrating GPT APIs without a meaningful use case — the same pattern as early databases bolted onto apps for novelty. His filter: does this AI capability (summarization, RAG, outline-to-doc) map to a real job users need done? AI that doesn't solve a specific pain point is a gimmick that erodes trust and dilutes focus.
“If a thousand people are going to churn from your app over the next 6 months and you can hope to win back 5 to 10% like how meaningful of a impact to your business is that compared to like so many other opportunities that you can have much higher impact.”
Win-Back Campaigns Are Low-Hanging Fruit Only If You Have Enough Scale
Ramit challenged the assumption that win-back is always worth doing. At small scale, the math rarely pencils — 50–100 recovered subscribers from a win-back campaign is noise. The opportunity cost of the engineer-hours is almost always higher. Win-back becomes high-ROI only once churn volume reaches a level where even a small percentage recovery is material.