Founder Playbook

Bootstrapping
I will stand up and say everybody on this call do not switch to the new business model. Like do not. It is at best a bad idea, at worst a huge distraction. The 2% discount is not insubstantial — maybe 12% of fees reduction — but you're accepting this potentially catastrophic risk that if your app goes viral, you can owe Apple millions on Core Technology Fee.

Indies should NOT switch — 2% upside doesn't compensate for catastrophic tail risk

Jacob's blunt advice to indie founders: don't be a guinea pig. The headline 2% fee reduction looks attractive until you model what happens to a free app that suddenly goes viral and racks up €0.50 per install on millions of free downloads. Let larger companies with modelable cases go first; this may be a one-way door.


D
DMA Panel: Gabriel (Runway), Nico (Adjacent), Jacob & Jens (RevenueCat), David Bernard
Apple's DMA Compliance (EU)New EU terms: 17%/10% commission + 3% payment fee + €0.50 Core Technology Fee per annual install over 1M — recorded <24 hours after Apple's announcement
Sub Club by RevenueCat
Apple's Response to the EU's DMA — What Developers Need to Know· 47:06
More tactics from DMA Panel: Gabriel (Runway), Nico (Adjacent), Jacob & Jens (RevenueCat), David Bernard